by Paul Auster
Novels and memoirs featuring dogs are a dime a dozen; some
are tragic, some comic, and others are filled with maudlin clichés. When my children were in elementary school,
one of their favorite books was No More Dead Dogs by Gordon Korman, about
a boy who finds it upsetting that dogs in literature usually die. Where the Red Fern Grows and Old
Yeller are two fine examples of this phenomenon. The sad fact is, however, that dogs only live about ten
years in the best of circumstances so even if Old Dan, Little Ann, and Old
Yeller had survived their travails, their owners’ hearts would have been broken
anyway. For those of us who are
fortunate enough to share our lives with dogs, the end always comes too soon, because no matter how much trouble they cause dogs
have a way of wrapping themselves around our hearts, and without them our lives
and homes feel empty. Of course, not
every dog is loved and wanted and not every person loves dogs; but when a dog
and a person bond, it is a mysterious and beautiful connection.
Timbuktu, by
Paul Auster, invites the reader into the world of a homeless man, Willy G.
Christmas, and his canine companion, Mr. Bones.
Unlike the typical dog story, Timbuktu is about a dog who loses his person and not the other way around. Mr. Bones,
with his keen olfactory, recognizes that it’s the end of the line for Willy G.;
and as the two make their way to Baltimore, Maryland, we learn bits and pieces
of their individual and joint life stories, just enough to paint a picture of two
good souls who live their lives on the fringes of society. While Mr. Bones cannot engage in a dialog
with Willy G., he listens carefully and patiently to his partner’s constant and
rambling monologue, paying close attention to the unspoken messages and the
magnificent “symphony of smells” that greet his miraculous senses at every
turn.
In Willie G.’s
mythology, “Timbuktu” is the afterlife. (In reality, Timbuktu is an ancient city in
the African nation of Mali, which was once a major crossroads on the
Trans-Saharan caravan routes. It was
long a place shrouded in mystery because no westerner who ventured there had come
out alive until 1828, when a Frenchman named René Caillié, disguised as a Muslim, visited the city and returned to
France to collect his 10,000 franc prize.)
Mr. Bones worries that Timbuktu is not a place for dogs and he fears
that he will never see Willy G. again.
For all of Willy G.’s love of and devotion to Mr. Bones, he never speaks of
seeing his dog in the afterlife.
Instead, Willy G. provides Mr. Bones with plenty of warnings about the
dangers lurking everywhere a stray dog might find himself. His most dire warning is about Chinese
restaurants. “The chefs round up
strays and slaughter them in the alley right behind the kitchen – ten, twenty,
thirty dogs a week… Unless you want to
wind up in a platter of moo goo gai pan, you’ll think twice before you wag your
tail in front of one of those [Chinese] beaneries. .. Know thine enemy – and then keep a wide
berth.”
A
theme Paul Auster often explores in his works of fiction is that of the social
misfit who writes endlessly in notebooks which pile up over a period of
years. We learn that Willy’s reason for
walking from Brooklyn, New York, to Baltimore, Maryland, is to deliver his
manuscripts and his dog to Miss Bea Swanson.
Willy G. explains to Mr. Bones the
urgency of finding his English teacher because without her to safeguard his
manuscripts, it will be as if he had never existed. When the hour of Willy G.’s death is at hand, Mr. Bones dreams
a clairvoyant dream in which he becomes a fly and is able to watch
as Willy G. is taken to a hospital by ambulance and reunited with his high school
English teacher, the one person who ever believed in him.
When the police
officers from Mr. Bones’ dream appear in reality and call an ambulance, rather
than wait for them to start chasing him he runs, confident in the knowledge of
Willy G.’s fate. During the seven years
that he accompanied Willy G. Christmas on his ramblings across America, often
hungry, but never lonely, Mr. Bones’ world was narrated, annotated, and
footnoted. Willy’s monologue continues
to play in Mr. Bones’ head and in this way we learn how it is that Willy
Gurevitch, a gifted Columbia University student, lost his way in life and ended
up homeless; why he overcame a lifelong indifference to dogs in order to adopt
Mr. Bones; and how the the long arm of history distorted his parents’, and
therefore his own, life.
After several days
on the street avoiding capture, Mr. Bones surrenders to hunger and allows a
young Chinese boy to befriend him. The
boy, whose parents own a Chinese restaurant, suffers from loneliness and harsh
discipline at his father’s hands. He and
Mr. Bones bond immediately, in the way that dogs and children will, and a
surreptitious feeding program begins.
Because dogs live in the moment, Mr. Bones temporarily forgets about
Willy G. Christmas and adapts to life hidden in a box in a blighted vacant lot
behind the restaurant. When the
inevitable happens and Mr. Bones finds himself once again homeless, he
remembers Willy G.’s warnings and runs as far and as fast as he can until he
collapses in a thicket behind a suburban home many miles away from Baltimore.
At one point in Mr.
Bones’ remembering of Willy G.’s surreal and poetic monologue, he reminds us that “dog” is
used as a metaphor for everything from sickness to happiness. We have the dog in the manger (greed),
junkyard dog (violent bully), sick puppy (head case), and bitch (mean
lady). On the other hand, the big dog
(leader) often has his (or her) lucky day.
Paul Auster obliquely refers to the
differences in human relationships with dogs:
some cultures revile them, some eat them. Why many of us in the Western World live with
them and treat them as family probably has much to do with our conception of
the soul as the essence that departs the body upon death. We look at them and they look into us. When they leave us, we mourn, sometimes for years; and yet they remain in our hearts to remind us that goodness exists.
Understanding the nature of existence is the essence of Timbuktu. Existentialism is a branch of philosophy concerned with the notion that each human is an individual adrift in a sea of other individuals. For many, living a social life seems easy and natural, but for others every interaction is a challenge. Life in primitive societies was about surviving day by day: hunting, gathering, and protecting the young. As societies moved away from clan-based subsistence and evolved into complex social hierarchies in an industrialized world, people began questioning the purpose of life and a few, who did not have to toil in order to eat, became consumed with finding reasons for their own existence. As monarchies fell to democracy, fascism, and communism -- and news of cruel and hateful acts, committed on an epic scale, spread far and wide -- the absurdity of human existence became the primary focus of writers and philosophers such as Samuel Beckett, Franz Kafka, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Eugène Ionesco, Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, and others. Paul Auster studied the existentialists as well as Freudian psychoanalysts such as Jacques Lacan in his own attempt to make sense of a perplexing world.
Understanding the nature of existence is the essence of Timbuktu. Existentialism is a branch of philosophy concerned with the notion that each human is an individual adrift in a sea of other individuals. For many, living a social life seems easy and natural, but for others every interaction is a challenge. Life in primitive societies was about surviving day by day: hunting, gathering, and protecting the young. As societies moved away from clan-based subsistence and evolved into complex social hierarchies in an industrialized world, people began questioning the purpose of life and a few, who did not have to toil in order to eat, became consumed with finding reasons for their own existence. As monarchies fell to democracy, fascism, and communism -- and news of cruel and hateful acts, committed on an epic scale, spread far and wide -- the absurdity of human existence became the primary focus of writers and philosophers such as Samuel Beckett, Franz Kafka, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Eugène Ionesco, Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, and others. Paul Auster studied the existentialists as well as Freudian psychoanalysts such as Jacques Lacan in his own attempt to make sense of a perplexing world.
The great beauty of
dogs is that they don’t care about things like mental illness and physical attributes. They love us no matter what we look like, who
are parents are, how nice our home is, or the number of friends we have. The nature of this love is unknowable,
however. Some scientists posit that
domestic dogs evolved over time as a matter of survival: becoming appealing to their human hosts in
order to secure regular meals. They theorize
that the love is one-sided, that dogs are mirrors reflecting what we want to
see. Paul Auster’s book suggests
something else; that dogs are spiritual creatures who connect with us to help
us see that there is an afterlife where hope never dies.
Copyright 2013 Teresa Friedlander all rights reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment